Wednesday, 26 November 2008
|
| Looking for a nice purse camera for not a lot of money Sarah Houston 12:36:30 |
| | I'd like to take pretty decent photos ( I'm not a pro or anything ) with a
small light weight camera that I can keep in my purse.
I want something better than my Blackberry's camera, yet not super
expensive, heavy or bulky, because it does have to fit the purse.
Something with USB of course, for transferring files to the PC.
Is there anything with a pretty decent lens too?
|
| |  9 answers | Add comment |
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
|
| allImage - European Photographic Network - new portal allImage - European Photographic Network 13:54:40 |
| | European Photographic Network is a project to establish a website for
photographers and people interested in photography to share their work,
opinions, to network and get any information they need in this area.
At this stage we're starting an open gallery. Later stages TBD.
Have a look
http://www.allImage.eu
Register, Upload some pictures and be one of the firsts to use it
Give it a try and send us any comments as there are probably still some
bugs in the code.
All the best
allImage.eu
... also find us on Facebook:
allImage - European Photographic Network
|
| | 5 answers | Add comment |
|
| Re: |TROLL| Re: 25 Reasons to Choose a P&S Camera Instead Of an Overpriced
DSLR (minor typo cor Paul Furman 05:51:59 |
| | Stephen Bishop wrote:
Vern, <CashTownsend> wrote: Although some P&S lenses are quite good, none are f/1.8 or faster, most have purple fringing CA problems & there are no really wide recitilear options on P&S. You failed to read to what you are trying to refute. Already covered and disputed. Points #1, #2, etc. Purple fringing is a problem of ALL digital cameras. It is NOT caused by the lens, but by the sensor (are you actually this stupid?). Some DSLRs are worse in this regard than the better P&S cameras. Purple fringing is not just in the realm of P&S cameras. But only a moron would say something like that. Correction. The purple fringing that plagues most P&S cameras is rarely seen in dslrs. The problem is partly the sensor, which is made worse by the small size of the P&S version. The other part of the problem is the extremely short focal lengths of lenses on P&S cameras.
It used to be believed that purple fringing was sensor blooming, maybe
it is a part of how tiny pixels emphasize CA in the lens but mostly it
is CA of the sort that you see is super-fast DSLR lenses, or cheap
lenses. I think this is because it is challenging making such tiny
lenses and designing them on the far limits of speed (which still isn't
very fast). Yeah I know that's a pretty wish-washy answer but it's my
best understanding from quite a bit of reading on the subject over the
years and using a lot of different lenses. Feel free to add to that.
I've got a good enough reputation in here, I don't think I need to dig
up links. Take it for what it's worth. It doesn't really matter to me.
Anyways the effect is rare on DSLRs and ubiquitous on P&S as anyone knows.
Lenses faster than f/2.0 are often subject to optical aberrations due to being difficult to figure properly.
Yep. Pretty much impossible for P&S, easy for normal focal lengths on
DSLRs harder for wide & super-tele. Yes there are some odd effects, they
are still very useful and can be stopped down to clean them up.
They can only be used effectively at one aperture to gain optimum use from them.
Almost true on P&S. Diffraction won't let you stop down much without
losing resolution, maybe 2 stops of play versus 6 or more stops to play
with on fast DSLR lenses on full frame.
--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com
all google groups messages filtered due to spam
|
| | 22 answer | Add comment |
Monday, 24 November 2008
|
| Re: Pictures, Images, Photographs Of Marc Wigle, Darrell A. Larose, Marc
Bissonnette, & Will U Tony 23:51:47 |
| | They all look like identical twins
olaftimandahaff22@gmail.com wrote:
Pictures, Images, Photographs of these PERVERTS.. Pictures, Images, Photographs of Darrell A. Larose herpes.jpg Pictures, Images, Photographs of Marc Wigle (The Tax Man) aka jean- herpes.jpg Pictures, Images, Photographs of Marc Bissonnette (http:// herpes.jpg Pictures, Images, Photographs of Will Ulmer of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, herpes.jpg
--
The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG
Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city
Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know
proper manners
Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs,
Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!
El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar
Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions
beyond the realm of understandability
Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday
|
| | Add comment |
Tuesday, 18 November 2008
|
| slideshow application and photos Nicholas Green 05:19:26 |
| | Good day
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
Best regards
--
Nicholas Green aka green9006 at NicholasGreen9004@msn.com
|
| | 2 answer | Add comment |
Monday, 17 November 2008
|
| Nikon D700x another Nikon upgrade? .. 01:12:54 |
| | Nikon brings out a new DSLR only to update it 6 months later. The D700 has
not be available that long and now they are discontinuing it and replacing
it with an upgrade, D700X. They did the same with the D40X introduced it and
then 4 months later discontinued it.
I was looking at a D90 but if there is a chance it could be discontinued in
6 months maybe I should wait?
|
| | 24 answer | Add comment |
Sunday, 16 November 2008
|
| Looking for RA4 roller transport processor Ken Hart1 22:00:30 |
| | I'm looking to buy a working RA-4 roller transport capable of handling at
least 30" wide prints. Hopefully located somewhere near SW Indiana.
Barring that, I might be looking for 30"x40" trays and a sufficiently large
water-jacket sink.
--
Ken Hart
kwhart1@verizon.net
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
Saturday, 15 November 2008
|
| Beseler 810 V-XL Cold Light Enlarger David Mendelsohn 16:06:28 |
| |
Sweet enlarger for the serious large format user. Incredibly sturdy and
in mint shape. Will shoot all formats from 35mm up to 8x10 but bought
it for the latter. Two bases, the original 24 x 30 " and the optional
31 x 36 " . The head can also be turned 90 degrees to shoot against the
wall, though I've never needed to do this. All instruction manuals. All
film carriers including the 8x10 and all Kodak 300 x 350 mm Acetate
Gels for VC. They slip below the light source but above the lens and
neg in it's own drawer. Read about " cold light " for it's advantages.
Transformer/stabilizer for head and a digital Graylab timer. All
instruction manuals. If you Google around, you will find this to be a
great piece of gear at a very good price.
1200 Bucks
Would rather not ship, but can do. Shipping will be at cost but done by
professionals. We live near Portsmouth NH., one hour north of Boston.
FedX Ground seems to be quicker and cheaper than UPS.
Also have four mounted lenses for a package price. To be clear, they
don't come w/ the enlarger . If you want them, add 250 bucks to the
price.
Fujinon 135 / 4.5 Bessler 240 / 9 El Nikkor 50 / 2.8 El Nikkor 80 /
2.8
David
eyesite@davidm.com
603-659-2530
--
David Mendelsohn
|
| | Add comment |
|
| Re: Olympus E 410 Camera Richard Knoppow 07:40:22 |
| |
"Shopping-Online"
This is spam. Advertising is forbidden by the charters
of the rec.photo groups. These are repeat spamers. Spam to
this and other rec.photo groups will be reported each and
every time is appears. Please do not do business with people
who cheat the rules of a Usenet group, they will also cheat
you.
--
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
|
| | Add comment |
Friday, 14 November 2008
|
| Re: A New 8x10 Field-Camera. John J 16:07:55 |
| | Keith Tapscott. wrote:
The ABS structure disturbs me. I'd rather see machined metal - even
aluminum of the proper grade would be better.
Overpriced, as-is.
Many of us can make the same more economically.
|
| | 6 answers | Add comment |
|
| Sources for Copal f stop scales? Craig Schroeder 05:50:38 |
| | I'd like to mount a Fujinon 90 to a Copal #0 that only has an f stop
blank scale. What are some solutions and sources for getting a proper
scale or making one with the correct spacing?
Craig Schroeder
craig nospam craigschroeder com
|
| | 3 answer | Add comment |
Thursday, 13 November 2008
|
| Curious on a LF lens quality Lgla 04:05:26 |
| |
Curious if anyone here uses any old Schneider Xenar 150mm on their 4x5? Can anyone
give a good impression of it's qualities? I know it is a four element in three group design
and related to the tessar design.
Large_Alex
|
| | 9 answers | Add comment |
Wednesday, 12 November 2008
|
| how to extract photos from
the slideshow Dalton Christopher 15:33:41 |
| | Good day
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thank you,
--
Dalton Christopher aka christopher_2511 at dalton_5212@postmaster.co.uk
|
| | 2 answer | Add comment |
|
| slideshow photos Moore Amber 15:33:41 |
| | Hello,
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thnx a lot for help
--
Moore Amber aka MooreAmber_3947 at MooreAmber7921@msn.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| images from slideshow? Dalton Amber 15:33:40 |
| | Hiya
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thank you
--
Dalton Amber aka Amber_1993 at DaltonAmber986@inbox.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| how to extract images from slideshow Smith Christopher 15:33:32 |
| | Hello
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thank you,
--
Smith Christopher aka SmithChristopher1961 at smithchristopher1980@postmaster.co.uk
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
|
| slideshow image Dwyer Michael 15:33:30 |
| | Hiya
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thanks,
--
Dwyer Michael aka Dwyer_1965 at dwyermichael7120@juno.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| Slideshow... Dalton Joshua 15:33:29 |
| | Howdy
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
Best regards
--
Dalton Joshua aka DaltonJoshua_1988 at DaltonJoshua_1960@walla.com
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
|
| can't get images from
the slideshow Wilson Thomas 15:33:28 |
| | Good day
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thnx a lot for help
--
Wilson Thomas aka wilson6287 at wilsonthomas1974@walla.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| How to recover images from
the slideshow? Bryant Nicholas 15:33:27 |
| | Hello,
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
Regards
--
Bryant Nicholas aka Nicholas_2411 at BryantNicholas_1972@msn.com
|
| | Add comment |
|
| how to read images fromt he
slideshow Moore Austin 15:33:26 |
| | Howdy
I need to extract images from my wedding slideshow, I've found
software called MultiExtractor from http://www.multiextractor.com but it's
paid, do you know any free replacement?
thank you very much
--
Moore Austin aka Austin1974 at austin7300@spymac.com
|
| | 1 answer | Add comment |
Tuesday, 11 November 2008
|
| Current view on drum scanning? Airbus 22:26:48 |
| | What's the consensus, as we close 2008?
Anyone still using drum scanners with PMT tubes?
Any particular reason, from a photographer's point of view, why this
technology is still pertinent, or do most users fee that fletbed scanners
have come to where they can replace this older technology?
Interested to hear views from anyone still using this. . .
Thanks
|
| | Add comment |
|
