The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down slightly from the 2003 level of $44,482. So now it's 3 years in a row; the Bush "recovery" has broken it's previous record of two straight years of declining income for the average American.
A full-time male worker earned a median income of $40,798 last year, down $963 in inflation-adjusted dollars from 2003. Women's median earnings fell $327, to $31,223.
The article goes on to state that there are 1.1 million more Americans in poverty this year than last year, and that is using a pretty strict definition of poverty.
The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down slightly from > the 2003 level of $44,482. So now it's 3 years in a row; the Bush > "recovery" has broken it's previous record of two straight years of > declining income for the average American.>
A full-time male worker earned a median income of $40,798 last year, down > $963 in inflation-adjusted dollars from 2003. Women's median earnings fell > $327, to $31,223.>
The article goes on to state that there are 1.1 million more Americans in > poverty this year than last year, and that is using a pretty strict > definition of poverty.
Well, after todays gas price surge, there'll be a lot more Americans living in poverty.
Quoth cloud dreamer <invalid@invalid.com> in news:11hcq7lmpn1hn2b@corp.supernews.com:
P.C.K. wrote:>
Quiet Desperation wrote:>>
In article <df4etu$rjc$3@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu>, P C K>>> <pSPM@bufalo.edu> wrote:>>>
The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down slightly >>>> from the 2003 level of $44,482.>>>
Mine has gone up 30% under Bush. >>
The income of the top 1% has gone up quite a bit also. Your point?>
He probably works for Haliburton.
... or McDonalds made him night manager.
-- George Bush's War of Choice on Iraq is a totally unnecessary war. Every life lost, every limb lost, every disfigurement, every disability caused there is more blood on George W. Bush's hands, and on the hands of everyone who voted for George W. Bush.
The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down slightly from >>the 2003 level of $44,482. So now it's 3 years in a row; the Bush >>"recovery" has broken it's previous record of two straight years of >>declining income for the average American.>>
A full-time male worker earned a median income of $40,798 last year, down >>$963 in inflation-adjusted dollars from 2003. Women's median earnings fell >>$327, to $31,223.>>
The article goes on to state that there are 1.1 million more Americans in >>poverty this year than last year, and that is using a pretty strict >>definition of poverty.>
Well, after todays gas price surge, there'll be a lot more Americans living > in poverty.
More importantly, how are we going to blame this all on Clinton?
The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down slightly >>> from the 2003 level of $44,482. So now it's 3 years in a row; the >>> Bush "recovery" has broken it's previous record of two straight years >>> of declining income for the average American.>>>
A full-time male worker earned a median income of $40,798 last year, >>> down $963 in inflation-adjusted dollars from 2003. Women's median >>> earnings fell $327, to $31,223.>>>
The article goes on to state that there are 1.1 million more >>> Americans in poverty this year than last year, and that is using a >>> pretty strict definition of poverty.>>
Well, after todays gas price surge, there'll be a lot more Americans >> living in poverty. >
More importantly, how are we going to blame this all on Clinton?
Check your Republican Party talking points brochure:
"Bush *inherited* hurricane Katrina from Clinton"
Just like he inherited the Iraq War, the Halliburton scandal, and everything else he does wrong.
"P C K" <pSPM@bufalo.edu> wrote in message >>> news:df4etu$rjc$3@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu...>>>
And once again the media would rather show us idiot reporters >>>> standing in a storm than report on news that actually affects most >>>> Americans.>>>>
The median household income stood at $44,389 last year, down >>>> slightly from the 2003 level of $44,482. So now it's 3 years in a >>>> row; the Bush "recovery" has broken it's previous record of two >>>> straight years of declining income for the average American.>>>>
A full-time male worker earned a median income of $40,798 last year, >>>> down $963 in inflation-adjusted dollars from 2003. Women's median >>>> earnings fell $327, to $31,223.>>>>
The article goes on to state that there are 1.1 million more >>>> Americans in poverty this year than last year, and that is using a >>>> pretty strict definition of poverty.>>>
Well, after todays gas price surge, there'll be a lot more Americans >>> living in poverty. >>
More importantly, how are we going to blame this all on Clinton?>
Check your Republican Party talking points brochure:>
"Bush *inherited* hurricane Katrina from Clinton"
Agreed: messin' around with fat chicks always causes these kinds of problems.
Just like he inherited the Iraq War, the Halliburton scandal, and > everything else he does wrong.
Hell, the way I heard it, Clinton had Karl Rove created in a lab. Then the monster turned on him.
In article <2zCRe.298701$x96.46325@attbi_s72>, gmsingh@email.com wrote:>FDR wrote:
Well, after todays gas price surge, there'll be a lot more Americans living >> in poverty. >
More importantly, how are we going to blame this all on Clinton?
Poor "trotsky"; still as clueless as ever.
-- It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad for them, it's failing.
In article <df733e$roj$1@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu>, pSPM@bufalo.edu wrote:>Quiet Desperation wrote:>> In article <df7022$mhm$1@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu>, P C K>> <pSPM@bufalo.edu> wrote:
Ah, a conservative who suckles at the government teat.>>
Heh heh heh. Ideologues... So simple.>
Whereas hypocrisy is a much more complex subject.
What have I told you about using words whose meaning you do not comprehend?
-- It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad for them, it's failing.
your "intake" may have increased 30% but measured against the true inflation (i'm including all of the measures the gov-mint conveniently leaves out...) what is your real increase?
interesting--the author titles the article with "average" then quotes "median." perhaps i'm the one who's confused?!
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please . Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста .